Risk Management
Policies
Of late, the business environment changes significantly and the
types of risks in business activities span a broad range. The
NISSIN FOODS Group properly understands all kinds of internal and
external risks and works to prevent risks from manifesting and
mitigate damage when they do to seek sustainable growth while
protecting corporate value.
For risk management, we aim to meet the expectations of a wide range
of stakeholders, and our basic policy is to build a resilient corporate
foundation.
Structure
Risk Management Structure
The NISSIN FOODS Group has put in place a Comprehensive Risk
Management Committee chaired by the Executive Vice President/COO
to prevent, identify, manage, and address a wide variety of
risks. Based on the NISSIN FOODS Group Code of Risk Management,
the risk management departments take on the role as secretariat,
and persons responsible for risk measures are appointed at major
NISSIN FOODS HOLDINGS departments as well as at Group companies
in Japan. Besides managing risks in an integrated manner, the
Comprehensive Risk Management Committee instructs major NISSIN
FOODS HOLDINGS departments and business corporations to identify
hidden and manifested risks in our value chain and to establish
mechanisms to prevent risks and minimize damage. If an event
occurs and has a severe impact on the Group, the chairperson of
the Comprehensive Risk Management Committee sets up a Group
serious incident taskforce headed by the CEO to quickly address
the incident and put forward measures to prevent a recurrence.
In addition, product accidents, business continuity planning (BCP),
compliance, and information security are positioned as our four key
risks, and each key risk has its own committee to study the mitigation
of manifested risks and measure to prevent risks.
Major risks related to the environment and human rights are also
continuously monitored by the Sustainability Committee, chaired by
the President & Representative Director/CEO. Thematic working
groups established under this committee discuss sustainability-related
risks, such as climate change and biodiversity. Furthermore, we collaborate
with the Comprehensive Risk Management Committee to monitor the processes
for managing major risks across the entire Group, striving to prevent
any impairment of corporate value. In the event of a serious accident,
such as one relating to the environment, we respond immediately in
accordance with our manual and take steps to contain and resolve
the situation.
To manage Group-wide risks, the Group undertakes early discovery of risks and proper response to them based on the framework of the Three Line Model*. We identify, analyze, and evaluate Group-wide risks to understand the risks to prioritized by the Group and build systems that generate self-discipline within our organizations.
- *
A model that proves that the governing body, management, and the
Auditing Division play three key roles in governance
First line: Business divisions (including associates in Japan and overseas)
The first line carries out daily operations based on stipulated regulations and internal procedures. Regarding risks and such accompanying the execution of duties, independent governance activities (identification, evaluation, management, and control of risks and such) are conducted as the risk owner.
Second line: Comprehensive Risk Management Committee as well as departments for risk management, compliance, and information security
The second line monitors, measures, and evaluates the independent governance activities undertaken by the first line, and at the same time, has the responsibility of formulating and promoting basic policies related to risk management and governance of compliance.
Third line: Auditing Division
The third line evaluates the activities of the first and second lines from an independent position as well as provides advice and undertakes correction to ensure effectiveness of risk governance.
Risk Management Process
The Group prepares risk assessment reports covering likelihood
and impact based on the results of interviewing presidents and
chief officers of the Group’s business corporations regarding
the state of risk management. Furthermore, in accordance with an
international risk assessment framework, we assign coefficients
to the financial impact, ripple effect, and insurance coverage
rate; as a Management Impact Assessment, each risk is assessed
and classified into one of four stages to identify major risks.
For each identified risk, specific policies are stipulated and
measures are implemented in an effort to reduce the risk. In
particular, for risks that have high Group-wide impact and span
several departments, we establish subcommittees comprising staff
from the relevant departments for monitoring of the management
state and implementing responses. In addition, the management
state of each risk and the effects of risk measures are reported
annually at meetings of the Board of Directors.
For FY 3/2026, we have established a policy to identify the four
key risks of unauthorized access (cyber-attacks), the global supply
chain, human resources, and reputation, as well as to comprehensively
manage the increasingly complex and interlinked risks from a company-wide
perspective.
FY 3/2025 Risk Map
| Category | Subcategory | |
|---|---|---|
| (1) Product liability | ① | Product liability (product accident) |
| ② | Food safety and security | |
| (2) Business continuity plan | ③ | Disasters and accidents |
| (3) Compliance | ④ | Violation of laws, regulations, etc. |
| ⑤ | Insider trading | |
| ⑥ | Personnel and labor affairs | |
| ⑦ | Infringement of intellectual property rights | |
| (4) Information security | ⑧ | Information leaks and unauthorized access |
| ⑨ | Information systems | |
| (5) Environment | ⑩ | Environment |
| (6) Reputation | ⑪ | Loss of brand value |
| ⑫ | Damage to corporate image and bad reputation | |
| (7) Finance and accounting | ⑬ | Accounting and tax affairs |
| ⑭ | Finance | |
| ⑮ | Resignation payment accounting supplementation | |
| (8) Corporate | ⑯ | Human resources |
| ⑰ | Corporate blackmail | |
| ⑱ | Group Governance | |
| ⑲ | Corporate Governance | |
| ⑳ | Shareholders | |
| (9) Supply chain management | ㉑ | Raw material procurement |
| ㉒ | Production asset maintenance | |
| ㉓ | Logistics | |
| ㉔ | Bad debts in supply chain | |
| (10) Other | ㉕ | Human Rights |
| ㉖ | Generative AI/AI agents | |
| Priority of response | Risk category | Likelihood (A) | Impact (B) | Total score (C) | Management Impact Assessment (A x B x C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Information leaks and unauthorized access | Medium | High | A | StageⅣ |
| 2 | Damage to corporate image and bad reputation | Medium | Medium | A | |
| 3 | Human resources | Medium | Medium | A | |
| 4 | Raw material procurement | Medium | Medium | A | |
| 5 | Disasters and accidents | Medium | Medium | A | |
| 6 | Logistics | Medium | Medium | B | |
| 7 | Personnel and labor affairs | Medium | High | B | |
| 8 | Violation of laws, regulations, etc. | Medium | Medium | B | |
| 9 | Environment | Medium | Medium | B | StageⅢ |
| 10 | Human Rights | Medium | Medium | B | |
| 11 | Production asset maintenance | Low | Medium | B | |
| 12 | Shareholders | Medium | Low | B | |
| 13 | Corporate Governance | Medium | Medium | C | |
| 14 | Group Governance | Medium | Low | B | |
| 15 | Generative AI/AI agents | Medium | Low | B | |
| 16 | Product liability (product accident) | Low | Medium | C | |
| 17 | Loss of brand value | Low | Low | C | StageⅡ |
| 18 | Infringement of intellectual property rights | Low | Medium | C | |
| 19 | Information systems | Low | Low | B | |
| 20 | Food safety and security | Low | Low | B | |
| 21 | Insider trading | Low | Medium | C | |
| 22 | Finance | Low | Low | C | |
| 23 | Accounting and tax affairs | Low | Low | C | |
| 24 | Bad debts in supply chain | Low | Low | C | |
| 25 | Resignation payment accounting supplementation | Low | Low | C | |
| 26 | Corporate blackmail | Low | Low | C |
- *Management Impact Assessment: A relative
assessment used to prioritize risk assessment and response
measures
Stage IV: A level requiring the strengthening of measures with the utmost vigilance
Stage III: Signs of significant impact. A level requiring ongoing measures.
Stage II: A level where continued implementation of routine measures is sufficient. - *Comprehensive coefficient
Calculated using a threshold designed to identify top-level risks that threaten the very survival of the company by pushing beyond the limits of the current risk management framework
For FY3/2026, based on an assessment of likelihood and impact, as well as results calculated using a comprehensive coefficient derived from an international risk assessment framework, we have identified four key areas: data breaches and unauthorized access (cyber-attacks), raw material procurement (global supply chain), human resources, and damage to corporate image and reputation. These risks do not occur in isolation; rather, they have the potential to develop into chain reaction scenarios—such as geopolitical risks → cyber-attacks → disruption of the global supply chain → soaring raw material prices → damage to reputation—and therefore require company-wide risk management.
Expected Risks and Mitigation Measures
| NISSIN FOODS Group risk category | Type of risk and acceptable range | Response to risk |
|---|---|---|
| Human resources |
|
|
| Information leaks and unauthorized access |
|
|
Annual Securities Report (Business and Other Risks) p.47 [PDF 20.3MB]
Emerging Risks
Risks that are expected to have severe long-term impact on the Group’s business activities—and which have yet to manifest but may appear in the future depending on changes in the external environment—are positioned as emerging risks. The Group evaluates medium- to long-term (three to five years or more) impact to business and responds to emerging risks.
Emerging Risks Related to Generative AI/AI Agents and Response Measures
| Explanation of risk | In recent years, rapid advances in generative AI and AI agents have led to significant changes in the risk landscape surrounding corporative activities. Within the Group, while AI is a key technology underpinning the advancement of our business operations, it can also be a source of new risks.
We also recognize that, as the evolution of AI brings about changes in business processes and decision-making, new risks may emerge in terms of governance and the capabilities and skills of our human resources. |
|---|---|
| Impact on the Group’s business activities | AI plays a vital role in advancing risk management; when utilized under appropriate controls, it presents opportunities to reduce risks and improve operational efficiency.
|
| Measures to address risk | Proposed measures for utilizing AI as a risk mitigation tool in the future
|
Emerging Risks Related to the International Situation and Their Countermeasures
| Explanation of risks | The worsening of relations and heightening of tension between countries—against a backdrop of political, social, military, and cultural factors around the world—may impact companies’ business continuity. In particular, the risks related to the international situation in the regions listed below may have severe impact on business continuity by disrupting the Group’s supply chains (paralyzing commercial logistics) and causing delays in procurement and the implementation of production strategies. They are therefore recognized as emerging risks.
|
|---|---|
| Impact to the Group’s business activities |
|
| Risk countermeasures |
|
Emerging Risks Related to Packaging Regulations and Countermeasures
| Explanation of risks | Intergovernmental negotiations*1 are ongoing worldwide to formulate a legally binding international instrument (treaty) to prevent environmental pollution caused by plastics. In addition, multiple countries and regions are advancing measures such as bans or reductions on single-use plastics, adoption of circular designs (monomaterialization, design for recyclability), mandatory or encouraged use of recycled materials, strengthening of EPR (Extended Producer Responsibility), introduction of deposit systems, and stricter labeling requirements. These developments could affect packaging design for products that serve as both containers and packaging, which the Group supplies globally. They are therefore recognized as emerging risks. |
|---|---|
| Impact to the Group’s business activities |
|
| Risk countermeasures |
|
- *1At the United Nations Environment Assembly in March 2022, an Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC) was established to develop a legally binding international instrument (treaty) aimed at ending plastic pollution. As of October 2025, no document has yet been agreed upon, but ongoing discussions are planned.
- *2NISSIN FOODS HOLDINGS joined the UK-based nonprofit organization established to realize a circular economy, in 2024.
- *3NISSIN FOODS HOLDINGS has participated in Circular Partners since its establishment in 2023, which aims to study measures for achieving a circular economy in Japan.
- *4NISSIN FOODS HOLDINGS has participated as a steering company in CLOMA (Clean Ocean Material Alliance), a public-private partnership working toward the sustainable use of plastic products and the development of alternative materials, since January 2019.